ASK Development
A national employability study, designed to be read twice.
The research was done.Getting it read was the job.
ASK Development ran a national study of graduate employability across Pakistani public and private universities and the employers who hire from them. The findings arrived the way research arrives: a literature review, a methodology, quantitative tables, interview transcripts, consultation notes, four annexes and a participant list. All of it necessary, none of it inviting. Development-sector studies are usually published as a file that someone opens once, scrolls, and closes. The brief was not to decorate that. It was to make one document that two different readers could get through without either of them giving up.
Built for skimming and for reading.
Two audiences never read the same way. A policymaker wants the recommendation and the shape of the evidence. A researcher wants the method and the tables. So the report is paced rather than styled. Section openers reset the eye with a full-bleed image and a single vertical title. A running head, a folio and a four-square mark hold the same position on every spread, so you always know where you are and how far in. Diagonal fields in the client's own palette code the sections. And the framework the study contributes, the Career Edge Model, is drawn as a diagram instead of described in a paragraph.
A report that survivesbeing put down.
The document was delivered print-ready in two editions, the full study and a condensed version, so the same research could be circulated at two lengths without either reader receiving the wrong object. The system underneath it is deliberately unremarkable: one running head, one folio, one mark, a palette that codes sections, and full-bleed openers that let the eye rest before the next table. That is what makes a long document navigable, and being navigable is what makes it likely to be opened a second time.
TimePay
